|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spacemann Spliff
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.11.29 05:03:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Spacemann Spliff on 29/11/2006 05:05:14 Edited by: Spacemann Spliff on 29/11/2006 05:04:09
Originally by: gu o
HOLY SH*T
this guy is not complaining cause he cannot run a dual rep, full rack blaster boat is he? cuase if thats the case my abba needs to run a dual rep 8 tach setup too
Snip.. {waxing stu**d ad nauseam...}
Dual rep tachs is not even in the same ballpark as a dual rep blaster-boat. He's certainly not talking about a dual rep 425mm rail ship is he?
A dual rep ion blasterthron is very hard to fit and even more challenging to fly. It has a lot of weaknesses and requires a careful micro-management of cap. The problem here is that active tanking in general has almost been rendered obsolete. Dedicated tanking ships with nos and plated up gank ships will be in vogue.
As for the blasterthron in general, now you have to get even closer to do less damage against ships with more base hitpoints and hevily boosted hitpoint mods. And to work with you get a disproportionately small cap increase that doesn't even compensate for active tanks and you have to run a set of cap leeching guns while doing it.
So yeh the balance swings from one patch to another and everyone knows that. But bringing up balance issues is important and your rude and incendairy post just makes you look like an a**.
|
Spacemann Spliff
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.11.29 05:03:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Spacemann Spliff on 29/11/2006 05:05:14 Edited by: Spacemann Spliff on 29/11/2006 05:04:09
Originally by: gu o
HOLY SH*T
this guy is not complaining cause he cannot run a dual rep, full rack blaster boat is he? cuase if thats the case my abba needs to run a dual rep 8 tach setup too
Snip.. {waxing stu**d ad nauseam...}
Dual rep tachs is not even in the same ballpark as a dual rep blaster-boat. He's certainly not talking about a dual rep 425mm rail ship is he?
A dual rep ion blasterthron is very hard to fit and even more challenging to fly. It has a lot of weaknesses and requires a careful micro-management of cap. The problem here is that active tanking in general has almost been rendered obsolete. Dedicated tanking ships with nos and plated up gank ships will be in vogue.
As for the blasterthron in general, now you have to get even closer to do less damage against ships with more base hitpoints and hevily boosted hitpoint mods. And to work with you get a disproportionately small cap increase that doesn't even compensate for active tanks and you have to run a set of cap leeching guns while doing it.
So yeh the balance swings from one patch to another and everyone knows that. But bringing up balance issues is important and your rude and incendairy post just makes you look like an a**.
|
Spacemann Spliff
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.11.29 05:03:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Spacemann Spliff on 29/11/2006 05:05:14 Edited by: Spacemann Spliff on 29/11/2006 05:04:09
Originally by: gu o
HOLY SH*T
this guy is not complaining cause he cannot run a dual rep, full rack blaster boat is he? cuase if thats the case my abba needs to run a dual rep 8 tach setup too
Snip.. {waxing stu**d ad nauseam...}
Dual rep tachs is not even in the same ballpark as a dual rep blaster-boat. He's certainly not talking about a dual rep 425mm rail ship is he?
A dual rep ion blasterthron is very hard to fit and even more challenging to fly. It has a lot of weaknesses and requires a careful micro-management of cap. The problem here is that active tanking in general has almost been rendered obsolete. Dedicated tanking ships with nos and plated up gank ships will be in vogue.
As for the blasterthron in general, now you have to get even closer to do less damage against ships with more base hitpoints and hevily boosted hitpoint mods. And to work with you get a disproportionately small cap increase that doesn't even compensate for active tanks and you have to run a set of cap leeching guns while doing it.
So yeh the balance swings from one patch to another and everyone knows that. But bringing up balance issues is important and your rude and incendairy post just makes you look like an a**.
|
Spacemann Spliff
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.11.29 05:03:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Spacemann Spliff on 29/11/2006 05:05:14 Edited by: Spacemann Spliff on 29/11/2006 05:04:09
Originally by: gu o
HOLY SH*T
this guy is not complaining cause he cannot run a dual rep, full rack blaster boat is he? cuase if thats the case my abba needs to run a dual rep 8 tach setup too
Snip.. {waxing stu**d ad nauseam...}
Dual rep tachs is not even in the same ballpark as a dual rep blaster-boat. He's certainly not talking about a dual rep 425mm rail ship is he?
A dual rep ion blasterthron is very hard to fit and even more challenging to fly. It has a lot of weaknesses and requires a careful micro-management of cap. The problem here is that active tanking in general has almost been rendered obsolete. Dedicated tanking ships with nos and plated up gank ships will be in vogue.
As for the blasterthron in general, now you have to get even closer to do less damage against ships with more base hitpoints and hevily boosted hitpoint mods. And to work with you get a disproportionately small cap increase that doesn't even compensate for active tanks and you have to run a set of cap leeching guns while doing it.
So yeh the balance swings from one patch to another and everyone knows that. But bringing up balance issues is important and your rude and incendairy post just makes you look like an a**.
|
Spacemann Spliff
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.11.29 05:03:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Spacemann Spliff on 29/11/2006 05:05:14 Edited by: Spacemann Spliff on 29/11/2006 05:04:09
Originally by: gu o
HOLY SH*T
this guy is not complaining cause he cannot run a dual rep, full rack blaster boat is he? cuase if thats the case my abba needs to run a dual rep 8 tach setup too
Snip.. {waxing stu**d ad nauseam...}
Dual rep tachs is not even in the same ballpark as a dual rep blaster-boat. He's certainly not talking about a dual rep 425mm rail ship is he?
A dual rep ion blasterthron is very hard to fit and even more challenging to fly. It has a lot of weaknesses and requires a careful micro-management of cap. The problem here is that active tanking in general has almost been rendered obsolete. Dedicated tanking ships with nos and plated up gank ships will be in vogue.
As for the blasterthron in general, now you have to get even closer to do less damage against ships with more base hitpoints and hevily boosted hitpoint mods. And to work with you get a disproportionately small cap increase that doesn't even compensate for active tanks and you have to run a set of cap leeching guns while doing it.
So yeh the balance swings from one patch to another and everyone knows that. But bringing up balance issues is important and your rude and incendairy post just makes you look like an a**.
|
|
|
|